All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [rfc] Proof-of-concept: refactoring raid6 recovery for the async case
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:53:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240962819.10249.2.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)

The goal of the following implementation is to demonstrate a proposed
re-factoring of the raid6 recovery code to isolate the operations that
can be accelerated by hardware.  These operations are xor,
gf-multiplication by a scalar (mult), and sum_product (the xor-sum of
two vectors multiplied by two scalars).

This version passes the tests from drivers/md/raid6test/test.c and
barring objections the approach (of course not this code) will be used
in the next version of the async-raid6 patchset.

Thanks,
Dan

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid6recov.c b/drivers/md/raid6recov.c
index 2609f00..68414d7 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid6recov.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid6recov.c
@@ -20,14 +20,42 @@
 
 #include <linux/raid/pq.h>
 
+static void sum_product(u8 *dest, u8 **srcs, u8 *coef, size_t bytes)
+{
+	const u8 *amul;
+	const u8 *bmul;
+	u8 ax;
+	u8 bx;
+	u8 *a = srcs[0];
+	u8 *b = srcs[1];
+
+	amul = raid6_gfmul[coef[0]];
+	bmul  = raid6_gfmul[coef[1]];
+
+	/* Now do it... */
+	while ( bytes-- ) {
+		ax    = amul[*a++];
+		bx    = bmul[*b++];
+		*dest++ = ax ^ bx;
+	}
+}
+
+static void xor(u8 *dest, u8 *src, size_t bytes)
+{
+	while (bytes--) {
+		*dest = *dest ^ *src;
+		dest++, src++;
+	}
+}
+
 /* Recover two failed data blocks. */
 void raid6_2data_recov(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, int failb,
 		       void **ptrs)
 {
 	u8 *p, *q, *dp, *dq;
 	u8 px, qx, db;
-	const u8 *pbmul;	/* P multiplier table for B data */
-	const u8 *qmul;		/* Q multiplier table (for both) */
+	u8 *srcs[2];
+	u8 coef[2];
 
 	p = (u8 *)ptrs[disks-2];
 	q = (u8 *)ptrs[disks-1];
@@ -50,26 +78,36 @@ void raid6_2data_recov(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, int failb,
 	ptrs[disks-2] = p;
 	ptrs[disks-1] = q;
 
-	/* Now, pick the proper data tables */
-	pbmul = raid6_gfmul[raid6_gfexi[failb-faila]];
-	qmul  = raid6_gfmul[raid6_gfinv[raid6_gfexp[faila]^raid6_gfexp[failb]]];
+	xor(dp, p, bytes);
+	xor(dq, q, bytes);
 
-	/* Now do it... */
-	while ( bytes-- ) {
-		px    = *p ^ *dp;
-		qx    = qmul[*q ^ *dq];
-		*dq++ = db = pbmul[px] ^ qx; /* Reconstructed B */
-		*dp++ = db ^ px; /* Reconstructed A */
-		p++; q++;
-	}
+	/* Now, pick the proper data tables */
+	coef[0] = raid6_gfexi[failb-faila];
+	coef[1] = raid6_gfinv[raid6_gfexp[faila]^raid6_gfexp[failb]];
+	srcs[0] = dp;
+	srcs[1] = dq;
+	sum_product(dq, srcs, coef, bytes);
+
+	/* dq is now reconstructed B */
+	xor(dp, dq, bytes);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(raid6_2data_recov);
 
+static void mult(u8 *dest, u8 *src, u8 coef, size_t bytes)
+{
+	const u8 *qmul;		/* Q multiplier table */
+
+	qmul  = raid6_gfmul[coef];
+
+	while (bytes--)
+		*dest++ = qmul[*src++];
+}
+
 /* Recover failure of one data block plus the P block */
 void raid6_datap_recov(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, void **ptrs)
 {
 	u8 *p, *q, *dq;
-	const u8 *qmul;		/* Q multiplier table */
+	u8 coef;
 
 	p = (u8 *)ptrs[disks-2];
 	q = (u8 *)ptrs[disks-1];
@@ -87,13 +125,11 @@ void raid6_datap_recov(int disks, size_t bytes, int faila, void **ptrs)
 	ptrs[disks-1] = q;
 
 	/* Now, pick the proper data tables */
-	qmul  = raid6_gfmul[raid6_gfinv[raid6_gfexp[faila]]];
+	coef = raid6_gfinv[raid6_gfexp[faila]];
 
-	/* Now do it... */
-	while ( bytes-- ) {
-		*p++ ^= *dq = qmul[*q ^ *dq];
-		q++; dq++;
-	}
+	xor(dq, q, bytes);
+	mult(dq, dq, coef, bytes);
+	xor(p, dq, bytes);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(raid6_datap_recov);
 



             reply	other threads:[~2009-04-28 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-28 23:53 Dan Williams [this message]
2009-04-29  1:49 ` [rfc] Proof-of-concept: refactoring raid6 recovery for the async case H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1240962819.10249.2.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.