From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1M0f7K-00071l-NY for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:04:42 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0f7I-00071e-OZ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:04:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0f7D-0006xW-6P for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:04:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57563 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0f7D-0006xL-0X for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:04:35 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:10452) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0f7C-0001xc-H4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:04:34 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 03 May 2009 13:04:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (c-69-141-194-35.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.141.194.35]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 417F534C6D for ; Sun, 3 May 2009 13:03:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20090503165547.GC22078@thorin> References: <20090502111547.GA28211@thorin> <1241325308.8745.39.camel@ct> <20090503165547.GC22078@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 13:04:33 -0400 Message-Id: <1241370273.4472.30.camel@ct> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve error messages in grub-setup X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 17:04:41 -0000 On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 18:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Agreed. It's no harm to add --force for users who are stuck in such layouts. > > Here's a new patch. I don't see the "force" variable affecting anything in setup() other than output. grub_util_warn() doesn't set any flag that there have been warnings. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin