From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1M0fFb-0005Qs-Kw for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:13:15 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0fFZ-0005QE-UV for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:13:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0fFV-0005N4-GH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:13:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37968 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0fFV-0005Mx-BZ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:13:09 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:22880) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0fFV-0002zL-1n for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 13:13:09 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 03 May 2009 13:13:08 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (c-69-141-194-35.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.141.194.35]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC67534C6D for ; Sun, 3 May 2009 13:11:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20090503155608.GD21659@thorin> References: <1240890910.29799.104.camel@mj> <20090502113928.GC28362@thorin> <1241324731.8745.36.camel@ct> <20090503155608.GD21659@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 13:13:07 -0400 Message-Id: <1241370787.4472.35.camel@ct> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Crash in usb_keyboard X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 17:13:14 -0000 On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 17:56 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Our alternative to interrupts has so far been polling. Is it viable to > poll for USB keyboards every time a read is attempted? We can try it. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin