From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1M0y8Q-0002oA-Ul for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 09:23:07 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0y8O-0002mp-Ay for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 09:23:04 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0y8J-0002kX-Cz for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 09:23:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49503 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0y8J-0002kQ-9b for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 09:22:59 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:63462) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0y8I-0004w1-Vi for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 09:22:59 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 04 May 2009 09:22:58 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1886B34C6D for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 09:21:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <1241369732.4472.27.camel@ct> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 09:22:57 -0400 Message-Id: <1241443377.6307.3.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 (2.26.1-2.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfs+ uuid X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 13:23:04 -0000 On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 15:08 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Setting two environment variables is undocumented. I think > rd_string > should not be needed. If you need it due to the script engine > problems, > it's better to fix the script engine. > I'm looking how to do it. The corresponding part to support foo=$bar > is here but commented out. The changes to fs/hfsplus.c look rather uncontroversial. Maybe you could apply that part first? And then we could deal with the xnu related stuff separately. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin