From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue used foractivate
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 17:35:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241742949.27327.1.camel@chandra-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A02565B.9060105@cs.wisc.edu>
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 22:32 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > Since scsi_dh_activate() has become an asynchronous function,
> > we do not need a workqueue for submitting scsi_dh_activate().
> >
> > This patch just removes the workqueue that submits scsi_dh_activate().
> >
>
> Before this is merged, we need to convert the other device handlers to
> use blk_execute_rq_nowait or use their own workqueue_struct right?
If we want those modules also behave async, then yes.
But, this set of 3 patches would work fine as I made the relevant
changes to those modules so that they work properly.
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-08 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 2:52 [PATCH 0/3] scsi_dh: Make scsi_dh_activate asynchronous Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-28 2:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: Change the scsidh_activate interface to be asynchronous Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-29 21:11 ` Moger, Babu
2009-04-28 2:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue used for activate Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-29 21:12 ` Moger, Babu
2009-05-07 3:32 ` Mike Christie
2009-05-08 0:35 ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2009-05-08 3:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue used foractivate Mike Christie
2009-05-08 5:25 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue usedforactivate Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-28 2:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Batch up MODE SELECTs and send few of them Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-29 21:12 ` Moger, Babu
2009-05-07 3:39 ` Mike Christie
2009-05-08 0:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Batch up MODE SELECTsand " Chandra Seetharaman
2009-09-12 4:09 ` [dm-devel] " Shyam_Iyer
2009-09-14 19:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1241742949.27327.1.camel@chandra-ubuntu \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.