From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 6/6] Adapt kexec and samples code to recognise PPC64 hardware breakpoint usage
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:55:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242312942.8608.38.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0905141617480.2225@vixen.sonytel.be>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1980 bytes --]
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 16:18 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 15:59 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 May 2009, K.Prasad wrote:
> > > > Modify kexec code to disable DABR registers before a reboot. Adapt the samples
> > > > code to populate PPC64-arch specific fields.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 6
> > > > samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c | 4
> > > >
> > > > Index: linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c 2009-05-14 00:17:24.000000000 +0530
> > > > +++ linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c 2009-05-14 09:48:09.000000000 +0530
> > > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > > > #include <asm/sections.h> /* _end */
> > > > #include <asm/prom.h>
> > > > #include <asm/smp.h>
> > > > +#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
> > > >
> > > > int default_machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -214,6 +215,9 @@
> > > > put_cpu();
> > > >
> > > > local_irq_disable();
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > + hw_breakpoint_disable();
> > > > +#endif
> > > ^^^^^^
> > >
> > > What about providing a dummy definition of hw_breakpoint_disable()
> > > in <asm/hw_breakpoint.h> if !CONFIG_PPC64?
> >
> > That would be good.
> >
> > What would be better, is to notice that machine_kexec_64.c is only ever
> > built for 64-bit - hence the name. And so no ifdefs or anything else is
> > required.
>
> Right ;-)
>
> But that can't be said for other files, like e.g. arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c.
Yeah you're right, the rest of this series could use lots of #ifdefs in
headers love.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090514133312.360702378@prasadkr_t60p.in.ibm.com>
2009-05-14 13:43 ` [RFC Patch 1/6] Prepare the PowerPC platform for HW Breakpoint infrastructure K.Prasad
2009-05-18 3:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-05-18 16:15 ` K.Prasad
2009-05-14 13:44 ` [RFC Patch 2/6] Introduce PPC64 specific Hardware Breakpoint interfaces K.Prasad
2009-05-14 14:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-14 19:50 ` [RFC Patch 2/6] Introduce PPC64 specific Hardware Breakpointinterfaces K.Prasad
2009-05-14 20:20 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-18 16:10 ` K.Prasad
2009-05-18 16:30 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-21 7:15 ` K.Prasad
2009-05-14 13:45 ` [RFC Patch 3/6] Modify ptrace code to use Hardware Breakpoint interfaces K.Prasad
2009-05-14 13:45 ` [RFC Patch 4/6] Modify process handling code to handle hardware debug registers K.Prasad
2009-05-14 14:54 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-14 13:45 ` [RFC Patch 5/6] Modify Data storage exception code to recognise DABR match first K.Prasad
2009-05-14 13:46 ` [RFC Patch 6/6] Adapt kexec and samples code to recognise PPC64 hardware breakpoint usage K.Prasad
2009-05-14 13:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-05-14 14:11 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-14 14:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-05-14 14:55 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2009-05-14 19:15 ` [RFC Patch 6/6] Adapt kexec and samples code to recognise PPC64hardware " K.Prasad
2009-05-14 20:21 ` [RFC Patch 6/6] Adapt kexec and samples code to recognise PPC64 hardware " Alan Stern
2009-05-18 16:11 ` [RFC Patch 6/6] Adapt kexec and samples code to recognise PPC64hardware " K.Prasad
[not found] <20090521070751.156865078@prasadkr_t60p.in.ibm.com>
2009-05-21 7:18 ` [RFC Patch 6/6] Adapt kexec and samples code to recognise PPC64 hardware " K.Prasad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242312942.8608.38.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.