From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:20:25 +0000 Message-ID: <1242836425.2881.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4A12797B.2060901@panasas.com> <4A12AC23.30808@panasas.com> <20090520111619.87f815b1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1242830240.2881.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090521004251.9160e228.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1242830865.2881.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:49794 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753985AbZETQUX (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 12:20:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1242830865.2881.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Tejun Heo , James Smart , linux-scsi , FUJITA Tomonori , Linux Kernel , Jens Axboe On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 14:47 +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > OK, so I think your pulling of my posmerge tree can cope with the fact > that I did the necessary rebasing in block for-next before I made it the > base of my combined tree .... think of this as a nice test. > > Just building now ... if it works, I'll push to SCSI post merge and all > our problems should go away. Unfortunately the combined tree hits a BUG_ON blk-core.c:2045 when doing SPI domain validation. There will be a short delay ... James