Re: [PATCH] gst-plugins: fixed pattern for meta package dependencies.

[Phil Blundell <pb@reciva.com>]

On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 16:47 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> This kind of matching on the package name is a bit unwholesome in
> general.  It would be better to handle these excluded packages by
> maintaining them in the blacklist at the point where they're actually
> created, rather than trying to recreate that information again after the
> fact.

Or, actually, in this specific case, just maintain a positive list of
the plugin packages that you _do_ want the metapackage to depend on, and
make it depend on those packages alone rather than starting from
${PACKAGES} and filtering things out.

p.