All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v4 3/3] kvm: add iosignalfd support
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:09:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243501772.4046.36.camel@blaa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1DA653.4050109@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:45 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > The virtio ABI is fixed, so we couldn't e.g. have the guest use a cookie
> > to identify a queue - it's just going to continue using a per-device
> > queue number. 
> 
> Actually, I was originally thinking this would be exposed as a virtio
> FEATURE bit anyway, so there were no backwards-compat constraints.  That
> said, we can possibly make it work in a backwards compat way, too. 
> IIRC, today virtio does a PIO cycle to a specific register with the
> queue-id when it wants to signal guest->host, right?  What is the width
> of the write?

It's a 16-bit write.

/* A 16-bit r/w queue notifier */
#define VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_NOTIFY         16

> > So, if the cookie was also the trigger, we'd need an
> > eventfd per device.
> >   
> 
> I'm having trouble parsing this one.  The cookie namespace is controlled
> by the userspace component that owns the corresponding IO address, so
> there's no reason you can't make "queue-id = 0" use cookie = 0, or
> whatever.  That said, I still think a separation of the cookie and
> trigger as suggested above is a good idea, so its probably moot to
> discuss this point further.

Ah, my mistake - I thought the cookie was returned to userspace when the
eventfd was signalled, but no ... userspace only gets an event counter
value and the cookie is used during de-assignment to distinguish between
iosignalfds.

Okay, so suppose you do assign multiple times at a given address -
you're presumably going to use a different eventfd for each assignment?
If so, can't we match using both the address and eventfd at
de-assignment and drop the cookie from the interface altogether?

i.e. to replace the virtio queue notify with this, we'd:

  1) create an eventfd per queue

  2) assign each of those eventfds to the QUEUE_NOTIFY address

  3) have only one of the eventfds be triggered, depending on what 
     value is written by the guest

  4) de-assign using the address/eventfd pair to distinguish between 
     assignments

Cheers,
Mark.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-28  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-26 19:15 [KVM PATCH v4 0/3] iosignalfd Gregory Haskins
2009-05-26 19:15 ` [KVM PATCH v4 1/3] eventfd: export eventfd interfaces for module use Gregory Haskins
2009-05-27  8:57   ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-27 11:53     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-05-26 19:15 ` [KVM PATCH v4 2/3] kvm: make io_bus interface more robust Gregory Haskins
2009-05-27  8:54   ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-27 11:26     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-05-26 19:15 ` [KVM PATCH v4 3/3] kvm: add iosignalfd support Gregory Haskins
2009-05-27  9:03   ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-27 11:47     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-05-27 12:11       ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-27 12:54         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-05-27 17:25         ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-27 17:40           ` Gregory Haskins
2009-05-27 17:48             ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-27 20:45               ` Gregory Haskins
2009-05-28  9:09                 ` Mark McLoughlin [this message]
2009-05-28 12:12                   ` Gregory Haskins
2009-05-31  9:11                     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-01 12:14                       ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-03 22:04               ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-04 13:20                 ` Mark McLoughlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1243501772.4046.36.camel@blaa \
    --to=markmc@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.