Re: More trials with grub

[Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>]

On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:05 +0100, James Jarvis wrote:
> Conscious that I am not a developer but it is useful to get feedback on 
> the project I have outlined progress mad so far with * to indicate 
> questions/discussion points.
> 
> I have been building a fat grub2 (using the fatglue.py script from rEFIT 
> project) to use on Intel Macs (mac mini; iMac 8,1; iMac 9,1 etc). This 
> works on both 32 and 64 bits architectures. Because the modules don't 
> work as fat files I tend to use a monolithic grub image. (FWIW, the idea 
> is to have a utility boot CD to pass out to our field operators.)
> 
> * Is there mileage in having the modules (when insertion is attempted to 
> not only try to insert <modpath>/name.mod but also <modpath>/name.<arch>.mod

It would be better to use different directories for different modules an
adjust prefix accordingly.

> Incidentally I have checked that I can insert the non-fat modules from 
> the fat grub2 monolithic image.
> 
> I have managed to have it boot from CD but it always chokes when trying 
> to find the grub.cfg on the CD - even though I have the required 
> filesystems in the monolithic grub image.

I believe it was caused by a bug in hfs filesystem that I have just
fixed.  With prefix ending with a slash, GRUB would add "/grub.cfg" and
the double slash would confuse hfs.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin