From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.33.2.25] (helo=smtp-out25.alice.it) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MCJDQ-0001Pz-G7 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:07:08 +0200 Received: from FBCMMO02.fbc.local ([192.168.68.196]) by smtp-out25.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:58:00 +0200 Received: from FBCMCL01B01.fbc.local ([192.168.69.82]) by FBCMMO02.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:57:57 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.166] ([80.117.37.182]) by FBCMCL01B01.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:57:57 +0200 From: GNUtoo To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1243977526.5049.53.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> References: <4A0DBCAC.5000403@balister.org> <1242424484.4514.117.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <200905160037.25213.mickey@vanille-media.de> <1242475355.4514.133.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <4A0EB79C.8030308@balister.org> <1243977526.5049.53.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:57:51 +0200 Message-Id: <1244145476.6678.4.camel@port4> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.4 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2009 19:57:57.0449 (UTC) FILETIME=[C1911390:01C9E54E] Subject: Re: progress on OE organization issues X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 22:18 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 08:54 -0400, Philip Balister wrote: > > Phil Blundell wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 00:37 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > >> My view on that is: The ideal situation would be that everyone interested in > > >> OE -- no matter on which level, technically, supportive, or administrative, > > >> becomes a member of the e.V. This is relatively straightforward and does not > > >> require any financial commitments per se as our status include that a member > > >> can chose its own membership fee. > > > > > > Sounds good to me. What exactly needs to be done in order to make this > > > happen? > > > > Translate the eV papers into English. Someone did feed it through an > > internet translator, but I can't find the output on the web. We should > > go ahead and put them on the wiki. > > What's the current status with this? I guess as a first step we should > at least get the German articles online, if that hasn't already been > done. That would make it easier to solicit volunteers for producing an > English translation. > > p. There is an interresting part on Legal status here: http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html#x1-190003 by the way why don't we join an umbrella organization? Denis.