From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <1244554081.7890.99.camel@domain.hid> References: <5D63919D95F87E4D9D34FF7748CE2C2A01A4598F@ARVMAIL1.mra.roland-man.biz> <1244554081.7890.99.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:38:23 +0200 Message-Id: <1244554703.7890.102.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Some problems with shared memory List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: roderik.wildenburg@domain.hid Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 15:28 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:25 +0200, roderik.wildenburg@domain.hid > > Yes and no: The restriction of a page aligned SHM-size seems to be ab= olished (I didn=C2=B4t get the error message "No such device or address" = any more). > > But my target still stalls, when I kill my test applications in the w= rong order. > > For your convenience I appended the test again (start "killtest -c &"= then "killtest &" and then kill the last one before the first). > >=20 >=20 > By "stalls", do you mean a lockup, or does your shell hang upon ^C whil= e > the rest of the system keeps running fine? >=20 In case you still do have access to your system while the killtest application stalled, then I would be interested by the combined output of /proc/xenomai/irq, taken 3 times in a row. TIA, --=20 Philippe.