Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

[Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de>]

Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 00:11 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 16:55 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:43 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > I wonder why nobody on this list noticed this yet.
> > > Jordi reported this already on Debian a while ago [0]
> > > 
> > > It fails with `No suitable backend could be found for gfxterm.'
> > > The problem is that gfxterm is used when nothing is explicitly specified
> > > and the fonts were compiled, but the fails because vbe.mod only gets
> > > compiled for i386-pc whereas gfxterm.mod gets compiled for every arches.
> > 
> > It looks like a conflict between grub-mkconfig and 00_header.
> > grub-mkconfig sets GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT to gfxterm because gfxterm.mod
> > is present, but 00_header refuses to use it because vbe.mod is absent.
> > 
> > Or maybe Debian sets GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT to gfxterm somewhere.
> 
> No, by default we don't set GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT at all.
> 
> > > I suggest as Jordi to just change the `exit 1' to ´exit 0' and telling
> > > the user that it falls back to native terminal:
> > 
> > I believe it's a wrong fix, as it would not prevent adding the gfxterm
> > code to grub.cfg.
> 
> Yes it won't. It would only prevent it from completely failing if
> gfxterm isn't avaible.
> 
> > I believe the fix belongs to grub-mkconfig (if it's not a Debian
> > specific issue).  Setting defaults in grub-mkconfig should be done very
> > carefully, as the numbered scripts treat those defaults as explicit
> > requests by the user.
> 
> So you would prefer something like the attached patch?
> Though then we'll need to tell people to explicit enable gfxterm.

Pavel? Seems like you missed my mail.
-- 
Felix Zielcke