From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Delay on intialization ide subsystem(most likely) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:44:01 +1000 Message-ID: <1244681041.5739.0.camel@pasglop> References: <20090425170203.74603b9c@power-debian> <200905201756.14769.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090530144643.76cb456e@power-debian> <200906082220.41763.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090611003834.7bde5e95@power-debian> <1244670377.3352.12.camel@pasglop> <20090611015733.39bab13a@power-debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090611015733.39bab13a@power-debian> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org To: Andrey Gusev Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, petkovbb@gmail.com, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 01:57 +0400, Andrey Gusev wrote: > > I wrote about time, why it have such values on second CPU? Sorry, if this > message is silly. Oh that's just because it hasn't synchronized the timebases yet when it prints those messages. Cheers, Ben. > I found configuration, where there isn't delay, but I need more time for > testing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 70.584122] hdb:<3>ide-pmac lost interrupt, dma status: 8480 > > > > > > > > DMA status indicates that DMA transfer is still active according > > > > to the controller. This one is really a platform/hardware > > > > specific issue. > > > > > > > > > > Notes for Ben, I checked only 2.6.26, but may be somebody checked > > > 2.6.24 or this is interpolation. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andrey > >