From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MEoPZ-00008L-Sk for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:50:01 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEoPU-0008Su-Ry for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEoPN-0008GQ-9j for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34261 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEoPJ-0008FF-UT for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:45 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:50355) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEoPI-0000SP-Vv for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:45 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2009 13:49:43 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA3D534C6A for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:54:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <1244741127.24612.19.camel@mj> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:41 -0400 Message-Id: <1244742581.27944.0.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Warning free build achieved for most platforms X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:49:59 -0000 On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 19:40 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > It's not entirely true. If you compile under FreeBSD you see a bunch > of warnings coming from the code inside #ifdef __FreeBSD__. Similar > thing happens with Apple's toolchain. It includes warnings > specifically added with #warning to inform about missing not-critical > part of code. OK, fair enough. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin