From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
mingo@elte.hu, yinghai@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:32:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245101567.12400.38.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090615112827.GC6012@wotan.suse.de>
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 13:28 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> If a couple of specialised early boot code places have
> to test slab_is_available() to prevent crap leaking into
> our main allocators, then that's quite fine by me.
slab_is_available() will not fix the problem in that case. In fact,
existing tests of slab_is_available() have been broken because they
assumed that when it was true, then GFP_KERNEL would work.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 13:25 [GIT PULL] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31 Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 13:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 13:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 14:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12 16:16 ` [GIT PULL v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 6:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-14 7:12 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-15 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 14:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-15 18:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 8:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-06-15 8:26 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 8:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-06-15 10:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:31 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 9:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:27 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 11:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 12:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-06-15 13:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-16 4:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 5:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 5:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 15:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 15:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 4:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 5:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 5:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-17 7:47 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-17 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-17 16:17 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-17 21:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 10:12 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 11:22 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 11:28 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 11:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 4:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-06-16 15:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 19:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-17 5:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-17 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-18 2:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-18 3:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-18 6:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-18 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 21:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 22:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245101567.12400.38.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.