From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: type bounds audit messages From: Eric Paris To: KaiGai Kohei Cc: Stephen Smalley , James Morris , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, sgrubb@redhat.com, Eamon Walsh In-Reply-To: <4A36EAA7.5090408@ak.jp.nec.com> References: <1244730288.10762.120.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A31A33F.2040504@ak.jp.nec.com> <1244807594.18947.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A35F091.6000202@ak.jp.nec.com> <1245071835.3247.57.camel@dhcp231-142.rdu.redhat.com> <1245074488.4078.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A36EAA7.5090408@ak.jp.nec.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:26:46 -0400 Message-Id: <1245162406.2848.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 09:43 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: > Stephen Smalley wrote: > For example, how do you feel the example on security_compute_av() time? > > type=SELINUX_INFO msg=audit(1245046106.725:65): \ > op=security_compute_av masked=bounds \ > scontext=system_u:system_r:user_webapp_t:s0 \ > tcontext=system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 \ > tclass=file { setattr write } I feel good for all but the { setattr write } It's a new message, we have no parsers which need the old format, how would others feel about perm="setattr,write" ? -Eric -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.