From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MHli6-00024e-1s for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:33:22 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHli4-00024C-Mz for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:33:20 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHli0-00020e-4P for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:33:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49143 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHlhz-00020F-Px for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:33:15 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:34527) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHlhy-0005Ws-TJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:33:15 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2009 17:33:13 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E3D934C6A for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:38:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <4A3BEF72.1050005@t-online.de> References: <4A3BEF72.1050005@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:33:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1245447191.672.5.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [2342] 2009-06-18 Vladimir Serbinenko X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:33:20 -0000 On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 22:05 +0200, Christian Franke wrote: > This was the AC_MSG_RESULT(...) for the > AC_MSG_CHECKING([for option to link raw image]) > which is still present for the "$grub_cv_apple_target_cc" != "yes" case. > > I would suggest to move the AC_MSG_CHECKING outside the 'if > "$grub_cv_apple_target_cc" = "yes" ... fi' and re-add the AC_MSG_RESULT. Thanks for pointing it out. Actually, the message is not needed at all. There is no "checking" that needs to be communicated to the user. It would be appropriate if configure was running a compiler or looked for some tool in the PATH. In this case, it's just shell variable assignments with on test for a file. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin