From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MJXz9-00018g-JG for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:18:19 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJXz8-00016u-43 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:18:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJXz3-0000yB-6O for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:18:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45762 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJXz3-0000xw-1c for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:18:13 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:48332) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJXz2-0007Z2-NM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:18:12 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 24 Jun 2009 15:18:10 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6113E34C6A for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:24:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20090624131139.GV11691@tas> References: <20090624112049.GU11691@tas> <20090624121159.GC1429@thorin> <20090624131139.GV11691@tas> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:18:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1245871088.29850.9.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: support for crashkernel= in 10_linux.in X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:18:18 -0000 On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 15:11 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote: > Maybe - my rational was to keep recovery mode as simple as > possible. And also in case there is a issue with the crashkernel= > commandlinethe user is still able to use recovery mode (its pretty > unlikely that there are problems though). I think it a patch that could stay in the Ubuntu package for the time being. It makes assumptions about the kernel that are not correct in the general case. You may want to explore the possibility or creating a file called e.g. 05_ubuntu or 05_crashkernel that would adjust GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT and do other Ubuntu-specific processing. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin