From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MJufQ-0006vX-3Q for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:31:28 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJufN-0006ti-RH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:31:25 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJufJ-0006p3-1r for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:31:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54573 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJufI-0006or-Q8 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:31:20 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:34067) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJufI-0005ea-AM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:31:20 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2009 15:31:18 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 037D334C6A for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:37:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <20090624120651.GB1429@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:31:16 -0400 Message-Id: <1245958276.18261.53.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:31:26 -0000 On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 20:13 +0800, Bean wrote: > You can use = or +=, actually the macro is used by genmk.rb to > generate the rules, it's not used by Makefile itself, so no problem > overriding it. While at that, it would be nice to use a special notation for the partial dependencies. Something like: aa:+ aa.o aa:+ bb.o Please don't use "_DEFINED" to mean "rule emitted", it's confusing. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin