From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MKJxs-0002mX-1L
	for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:12 -0400
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MKJxq-0002jC-7h
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:10 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MKJxl-0002Wk-ID
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:09 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49953 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKJxl-0002W5-54
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:05 -0400
Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:29719)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <proski@gnu.org>) id 1MKJxk-0006IQ-Ll
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:04 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112])
	by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2009 18:32:03 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
	[72.92.88.10])
	by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CAE834C6D
	for <grub-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:38:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <ca0f59980906252013v3e6ff6ffm83ad961be6b9394e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ca0f59980906240152h161ee8e7y49f0745715e6ff7b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090624120651.GB1429@thorin>
	<ca0f59980906240513p129ec56ckf5e5e0cc3649a787@mail.gmail.com>
	<1245958276.18261.53.camel@mj>
	<ca0f59980906252013v3e6ff6ffm83ad961be6b9394e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:01 -0400
Message-Id: <1246055521.20234.30.camel@mj>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
	recognized.
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files
X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/grub-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:32:10 -0000

On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:13 +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Pavel Roskin<proski@gnu.org> wrote:

> > While at that, it would be nice to use a special notation for the
> > partial dependencies.
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > aa:+ aa.o
> > aa:+ bb.o
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is this new syntax for GNU make ? My version report error when using :+ .

No.  I suggested syntax that would indicate that it's not a complete
make rule.

If we use Ruby to join the rules, we can replace ":+" with ":" in the
result.

> > Please don't use "_DEFINED" to mean "rule emitted", it's confusing.
> 
> How about  _RULES_DEFINED ?

I'm fine with anything that is descriptive.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin