From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MKL7K-0007aW-TS for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:46:02 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKL7J-0007ZX-RO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:46:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKL7F-0007UT-8K for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:46:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43174 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKL7F-0007UJ-5G for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:45:57 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:31429) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKL7E-0000Ql-KI for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:45:57 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2009 19:45:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30B1734C6D for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:52:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <20090622105959.GI8969@thorin> <1245695500.1926.10.camel@mj> <1245697145.1926.11.camel@mj> <1245698882.24040.1.camel@mj> <1245701210.2754.12.camel@mj> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:45:53 -0400 Message-Id: <1246059953.20234.36.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] File access library for lua X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:46:02 -0000 On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 00:39 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > "root hd0,3" has not effect. "root (hd0,3)" and "root=hd0,3" work. > > Yes, that's a bug in the root command. > Can't root command be ditched altogether? It sounds like completely > redundant to me and just taking precious kernel space Fine with me. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin