From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MKP1n-0002pz-A3 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:56:35 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKP1l-0002nV-NO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:56:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKP1h-0002gp-2j for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:56:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45454 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKP1g-0002gm-Vu for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:56:29 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:60554) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKP1g-0002P4-Et for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:56:28 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2009 23:56:23 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4609734C6D for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:03:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <20090624120651.GB1429@thorin> <1245958276.18261.53.camel@mj> <1246055521.20234.30.camel@mj> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:56:22 -0400 Message-Id: <1246074982.4569.0.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:56:34 -0000 On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 11:44 +0800, Bean wrote: > Oh, actually aa: aa.o is already a ruby generated rule, it doesn't > exist in rmk file. The original line from rmk would be something like > this: > > aa_SOURCES += aa.c I see. Sorry for the noise. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin