All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware FPU support for AMD
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:55:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246454746.3072.10.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19019.22396.776453.297335@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:33 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Ingo Molnar writes:
> 
> >         19583739  vec-adds               (   2.01x scaled)
> >         20856051  vec-muls               (   2.01x scaled)
> >         20856051  vec-divs               (   2.01x scaled)
> >      25100224054  vec-idle-cycles        (   1.99x scaled)
> >         12540131  vec-busy-cycles        (   1.99x scaled)
> >         42286702  vec-ops                (   2.01x scaled)
> > 
> > Paulus: would this categorization fit PowerPC too?
> 
> Conceptually that looks nice, but unfortunately we don't have events
> that correspond to that categorization on any PowerPC with vector
> hardware (VMX/Altivec).  POWER6 seems to have the most vector events,
> and they are mostly divided up along the lines of simple / complex /
> permute / load / store operations, and whether they are integer or
> floating-point operations.
> 
> Here are the vector-related events we have on POWER6:
> 
> MRK_VMX0_LD_WRBACK	Marked VMX0 load writeback valid
> MRK_VMX1_LD_WRBACK	Marked VMX1 load writeback valid
> MRK_VMX_COMPLEX_ISSUED	Marked VMX instruction issued to complex
> MRK_VMX_FLOAT_ISSUED	Marked VMX instruction issued to float
> MRK_VMX_PERMUTE_ISSUED	Marked VMX instruction issued to permute
> MRK_VMX_SIMPLE_ISSUED	Marked VMX instruction issued to simple
> MRK_VMX_ST_ISSUED	Marked VMX store issued
> VMX0_INST_ISSUED	VMX0 instruction issued
> VMX0_LD_ISSUED		VMX0 load issued
> VMX0_LD_WRBACK		VMX0 load writeback valid
> VMX0_STALL		VMX0 stall
> VMX1_INST_ISSUED	VMX1 instruction issued
> VMX1_LD_ISSUED		VMX1 load issued
> VMX1_LD_WRBACK		VMX1 load writeback valid
> VMX1_STALL		VMX1 stall
> VMX_COMPLEX_ISSUED	VMX instruction issued to complex
> VMX_FLOAT_ISSUED	VMX instruction issued to float
> VMX_FLOAT_MULTICYCLE	VMX multi-cycle floating point instruction issued
> VMX_PERMUTE_ISSUED	VMX instruction issued to permute
> VMX_RESULT_SAT_0_1	VMX valid result with sat bit is set (0->1)
> VMX_RESULT_SAT_1	VMX valid result with sat=1
> VMX_SIMPLE_ISSUED	VMX instruction issued to simple
> VMX_ST_ISSUED		VMX store issued
> 
> I'm not sure what the exact distinction is between VMX0 and VMX1.
> I'll find out.
> 

I am just guessing for powerpc, normally different units are for
different purpose like some do addition/multiplication and others do
division.

Like in Intel Corei7/Nehalem :

UOPS_EXECUTED.PORT0:     Counts number of Uops executed
                         that were issued on port 0. Port 0
                         handles integer arithmetic, SIMD
                         and FP add Uops.
UOPS_EXECUTED.PORT1:     Counts number of Uops executed
                         that were issued on port 1. Port 1
                         handles integer arithmetic, SIMD,
                         integer shift, FP multiply and FP
                         divide Uops.

Can you provide me the link of the Hardware manual so that I can check
it out.

Thanks,
--
JSR


      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-01 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-29  9:33 [PATCH -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware FPU support for AMD Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 13:20   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 14:56     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 22:42     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 23:14       ` Alan Cox
2009-07-01 12:33       ` Paul Mackerras
2009-07-01 13:12         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 13:25         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1246454746.3072.10.camel@ht.satnam \
    --to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.