From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:7024 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752732AbZGGPtp (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:49:45 -0400 Subject: Re: dead RT2501USB ? From: Pavel Roskin To: ptb@cs.bham.ac.uk Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com In-Reply-To: <200907071526.n67FQICE002753@barney.it.uc3m.es> References: <200907071526.n67FQICE002753@barney.it.uc3m.es> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:49:43 -0400 Message-Id: <1246981783.23943.10.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 17:26 +0200, Peter Breuer wrote: > Firstly: lsusb output: > > Bus 005 Device 002: ID 148f:2573 Ralink Technology, Corp. RT2501USB Wireless Adapter ... > Loaading the rt73usb module produces this stack (after a fair old delay > for the modprobe to come back) ... > So it thinks it's not the right chipset. Perhaps I should add an > identification line somewhere in the code? Try rt2500usb instead of rt73usb. Both drivers support 148f:2573. As far as I know, it's impossible to find out which driver would work with a particular device from USB ID alone. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin