From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: mmu_notifiers: turn off lockdep around mm_take_all_locks
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:04:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246993442.5197.15.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090707183741.GA8393@amt.cnet>
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 15:37 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is there any way around this other than completly shutting down lockdep?
> >>>
> >>
> >> When we created this the promise was that kvm would only do this on a
> >> fresh mm with only a few vmas, has that changed
> >
> > The number of vmas did increase, but not materially. We do link with
> > more shared libraries though.
>
> Yeah, see attached /proc/pid/maps just before the ioctl thats ends up in
> mmu_notifier_register.
>
> mm_take_all_locks: file_vma=79 anon_vma=40
Another issue, at about >=256 vmas we'll overflow the preempt count. So
disabling lockdep will only 'fix' this for a short while, until you've
bloated beyond that ;-)
Although you could possibly disable preemption and use
__raw_spin_lock(), that would also side-step the whole lockdep issue,
but it feels like such a horrid hack.
Alternatively we would have to modify the rmap locking, but that would
incur overhead on the regular code paths, so that's probably not worth
the trade-off.
Linus, Ingo, any opinions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-07 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 18:06 mmu_notifiers: turn off lockdep around mm_take_all_locks Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-07 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-07 18:18 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-07 18:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-07 19:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-07 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-07 20:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-07 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246993442.5197.15.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.