From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MObaR-0008IS-Ao for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:09:43 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MObaP-0008I5-TU for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:09:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MObaL-0008Fa-9R for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:09:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35232 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MObaL-0008FQ-0C for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:09:37 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:32355) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MObaK-00034O-8U for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:09:36 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2009 14:09:28 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73C5A34C88 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:18:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <4A54DE56.4040109@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> References: <20090708153823.GA7367@riva.ucam.org> <1247073732.2768.3.camel@mj> <4A54DE56.4040109@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:09:31 -0400 Message-Id: <1247076571.26368.2.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Configuration option to disable os-prober? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:09:42 -0000 On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:58 -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: > er, hmm, Configure option versus runtime option? I don't know from my > cursory inspection if there's an issue here, but you (Colin) would be > able to describe how/whether that's relevant I think the configurations options is the only way to go, as grub-mkimage can be rerun by the OS scripts when the kernel is updated. We already have similar "disable" options, such as GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_RECOVERY. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin