All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] GFS2: Don't put unlikely reclaim candidates on the reclaim list.
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:44:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247435053.3705.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090710230424.GT3172@ether.msp.redhat.com>

Hi,

Now in the -nmw git tree. Thanks,

Steve.

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 18:04 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> s placing far to many glocks on the reclaim list that were not good
> candidates for freeing up from cache.  These locks would sit there and
> repeatedly get scanned to see if they could be reclaimed, wasting a lot
> of time when there was memory pressure. This fix does more checks on the
> locks to see if they are actually likely to be removable from cache.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/glock.c |   72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: gfs2-2.6-nmw/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gfs2-2.6-nmw.orig/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> +++ gfs2-2.6-nmw/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,26 @@ static void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * demote_ok - Check to see if it's ok to unlock a glock
> + * @gl: the glock
> + *
> + * Returns: 1 if it's ok
> + */
> +
> +static int demote_ok(const struct gfs2_glock *gl)
> +{
> +	const struct gfs2_glock_operations *glops = gl->gl_ops;
> +
> +	if (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_UNLOCKED)
> +		return 0;
> +	if (!list_empty(&gl->gl_holders))
> +		return 0;
> +	if (glops->go_demote_ok)
> +		return glops->go_demote_ok(gl);
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * gfs2_glock_schedule_for_reclaim - Add a glock to the reclaim list
>   * @gl: the glock
>   *
> @@ -181,8 +201,13 @@ static void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_
>  
>  static void gfs2_glock_schedule_for_reclaim(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
>  {
> +	int may_reclaim;
> +	may_reclaim = (demote_ok(gl) &&
> +		       (atomic_read(&gl->gl_ref) == 1 ||
> +			(gl->gl_name.ln_type == LM_TYPE_INODE &&
> +			 atomic_read(&gl->gl_ref) <= 2)));
>  	spin_lock(&lru_lock);
> -	if (list_empty(&gl->gl_lru) && gl->gl_state != LM_ST_UNLOCKED) {
> +	if (list_empty(&gl->gl_lru) && may_reclaim) {
>  		list_add_tail(&gl->gl_lru, &lru_list);
>  		atomic_inc(&lru_count);
>  	}
> @@ -190,6 +215,21 @@ static void gfs2_glock_schedule_for_recl
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * gfs2_glock_put_nolock() - Decrement reference count on glock
> + * @gl: The glock to put
> + *
> + * This function should only be used if the caller has its own reference
> + * to the glock, in addition to the one it is dropping.
> + */
> +
> +static void gfs2_glock_put_nolock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
> +{
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&gl->gl_ref))
> +		GLOCK_BUG_ON(gl, 1);
> +	gfs2_glock_schedule_for_reclaim(gl);
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * gfs2_glock_put() - Decrement reference count on glock
>   * @gl: The glock to put
>   *
> @@ -214,9 +254,9 @@ int gfs2_glock_put(struct gfs2_glock *gl
>  		rv = 1;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> -	/* 1 for being hashed, 1 for having state != LM_ST_UNLOCKED */
> -	if (atomic_read(&gl->gl_ref) == 2)
> -		gfs2_glock_schedule_for_reclaim(gl);
> +	spin_lock(&gl->gl_spin);
> +	gfs2_glock_schedule_for_reclaim(gl);
> +	spin_unlock(&gl->gl_spin);
>  	write_unlock(gl_lock_addr(gl->gl_hash));
>  out:
>  	return rv;
> @@ -398,7 +438,7 @@ static void state_change(struct gfs2_glo
>  		if (held2)
>  			gfs2_glock_hold(gl);
>  		else
> -			gfs2_glock_put(gl);
> +			gfs2_glock_put_nolock(gl);
>  	}
>  
>  	gl->gl_state = new_state;
> @@ -633,7 +673,7 @@ out:
>  out_sched:
>  	gfs2_glock_hold(gl);
>  	if (queue_delayed_work(glock_workqueue, &gl->gl_work, 0) == 0)
> -		gfs2_glock_put(gl);
> +		gfs2_glock_put_nolock(gl);
>  out_unlock:
>  	clear_bit(GLF_LOCK, &gl->gl_flags);
>  	goto out;
> @@ -1274,26 +1314,6 @@ void gfs2_glock_complete(struct gfs2_glo
>  		gfs2_glock_put(gl);
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * demote_ok - Check to see if it's ok to unlock a glock
> - * @gl: the glock
> - *
> - * Returns: 1 if it's ok
> - */
> -
> -static int demote_ok(const struct gfs2_glock *gl)
> -{
> -	const struct gfs2_glock_operations *glops = gl->gl_ops;
> -
> -	if (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_UNLOCKED)
> -		return 0;
> -	if (!list_empty(&gl->gl_holders))
> -		return 0;
> -	if (glops->go_demote_ok)
> -		return glops->go_demote_ok(gl);
> -	return 1;
> -}
> -
>  
>  static int gfs2_shrink_glock_memory(int nr, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  {
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2009-07-12 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-10 23:04 [Cluster-devel] GFS2: Don't put unlikely reclaim candidates on the reclaim list Benjamin Marzinski
2009-07-12 21:44 ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1247435053.3705.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.