From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:14:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247476498.7529.54.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090713070110.GA28499@elte.hu>
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 09:01 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> It's a nice byproduct, beyond the primary advantage of not being a
> stack based recursion check.
>
> I think this patch-set is great, and there's just one more step
> needed to make it round: it would be nice to remove the limitation
> of maximum number of locks held per task. (MAX_LOCK_DEPTH)
>
> The way we could do it is to split out this bit of struct task:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL
> u64 curr_chain_key;
> int lockdep_depth;
> unsigned int lockdep_recursion;
> struct held_lock held_locks[MAX_LOCK_DEPTH];
> gfp_t lockdep_reclaim_gfp;
> #endif
>
> into a separate 'struct lockdep_state' structure, and allocate it
> dynamically during fork with a initial pre-set size of say 64 locks
> depth. If we hit that limit, we'd double the allocation threshold,
> which would cause a larger structure to be allocated for all newly
> allocated tasks.
Right, except allocating stuff while in the middle of lockdep is very
hard since it involves taking more locks :-)
I've tried it several times but never quite managed it in a way that I
felt comfortable with.
It would require having a reserve and serializing over that reserve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-13 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-28 15:04 [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 02/11] kernel:lockdep:improve implementation of BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 03/11] kernel:lockdep: introduce match function to BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/11] kernel:lockdep:implement check_noncircular() by BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 05/11] kernel:lockdep:implement find_usage_*wards " tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 06/11] kernel:lockdep:introduce print_shortest_lock_dependencies tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 07/11] kernel:lockdep: implement lockdep_count_*ward_deps by BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 08/11] kernel:lockdep: update memory usage introduced " tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 09/11] kernel:lockdep:add statistics info for max bfs queue depth tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 10/11] BFS cleanup tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 11/11] kernel:lockdep:fix return value of check_usage*() tom.leiming
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: BFS cleanup tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-18 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-02 13:03 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Add statistics info for max bfs queue depth tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:03 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Update memory usage introduced by BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement lockdep_count_*ward_deps " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Introduce print_shortest_lock_dependencies tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement find_usage_*wards by BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-13 8:02 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/11] kernel:lockdep:implement check_noncircular() " Dave Young
2009-07-13 8:08 ` Dave Young
2009-07-21 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Introduce match function to BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Improve implementation of BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-11 21:30 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-12 2:42 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 7:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-13 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-13 13:56 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 13:51 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 9:01 ` Dave Young
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Print " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-11 0:43 ` [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-11 3:25 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-11 21:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-12 2:29 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 7:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-13 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16 4:39 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-16 5:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16 7:12 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-16 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247476498.7529.54.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.