From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:56:05 +1000 Message-ID: <1247709365.27937.6.camel@pasglop> References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <1247708177.9851.4.camel@concordia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1247708177.9851.4.camel@concordia> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: michael@ellerman.id.au Cc: Linux Memory Management , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Builds for the important architectures, powerpc, ia64, arm, sparc, > sparc64, oh and x86: > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1976/ > > (based on your test branch 34f25476) Note for all lurkers: the fails in there are unrelated to the patch (mostly warnings triggering our new Werror and probably mostly fixed upstream already). Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:52964 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756939AbZGPB4Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:56:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1247708177.9851.4.camel@concordia> References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <1247708177.9851.4.camel@concordia> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:56:05 +1000 Message-ID: <1247709365.27937.6.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: michael@ellerman.id.au Cc: Linux Memory Management , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins Message-ID: <20090716015605.SwEQmg663HY3qRNrYVq_Hd_ZGEHF97jmy2YfS9FkCnA@z> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Builds for the important architectures, powerpc, ia64, arm, sparc, > sparc64, oh and x86: > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1976/ > > (based on your test branch 34f25476) Note for all lurkers: the fails in there are unrelated to the patch (mostly warnings triggering our new Werror and probably mostly fixed upstream already). Cheers, Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A957B7B72 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:56:21 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D64DDDDA0 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:56:20 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: michael@ellerman.id.au In-Reply-To: <1247708177.9851.4.camel@concordia> References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <1247708177.9851.4.camel@concordia> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:56:05 +1000 Message-Id: <1247709365.27937.6.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Linux-Arch , Nick Piggin , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Builds for the important architectures, powerpc, ia64, arm, sparc, > sparc64, oh and x86: > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1976/ > > (based on your test branch 34f25476) Note for all lurkers: the fails in there are unrelated to the patch (mostly warnings triggering our new Werror and probably mostly fixed upstream already). Cheers, Ben.