All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: New developing branch of grub2
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:24:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247840671.25608.18.camel@mj> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca0f59980907170252qca1c4a5vee0ee0855e0f8176@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 17:52 +0800, Bean wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've created a repository at GitHub to hold some developing patches,
> the main repos is at:
> 
> http://github.com/grub/grub/
> 
> master is the developing branch, while svn is the mirror of grub2 svn.
> 
> I also have a forked project at:
> 
> http://github.com/bean123/grub/
> 
> The lib branch contains the new object format code.

It's hard to see the unmerged changes in those repositories.

I can tell from my experience with Linux kernel development that
branches are not used for such efforts.  Patches need to be posted,
reviewed and discussed by others.

Separate branches or repositories are used for subsystems that have
their own maintainers.  That is, there is a repository for wireless
networking.  Patches are still posted and reviewed in a separate list.
Once they are good, they are committed to the subsystem repository.  And
then Linus pulls from it because he trusts the subsystem maintainers and
knows that the patches have been reviewed.

When patches are publishing for review, there is incentive for the patch
author to make changes clear.  When the patches are published as a
branch, chances are that the development will go too far before other
developers have a look at the code.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin



  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-17 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-17  9:52 New developing branch of grub2 Bean
2009-07-17 14:24 ` Pavel Roskin [this message]
2009-07-17 16:24   ` Bean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1247840671.25608.18.camel@mj \
    --to=proski@gnu.org \
    --cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.