From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MRoxo-0006jb-Tu
	for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:03:08 -0400
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MRoxn-0006iZ-I7
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:03:07 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MRoxi-0006f6-Im
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:03:06 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42747 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRoxi-0006en-Ah
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:03:02 -0400
Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:31332)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <proski@gnu.org>) id 1MRoxh-00060q-Ga
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:03:01 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay1.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.111])
	by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:02:59 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
	[72.92.88.10])
	by smtprelay1.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4311934C69
	for <grub-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:02:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <d7ead6de0907160853y2b108463j8238939e05e1b0c9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090715234038.31016.40532.stgit@mj.roinet.com>
	<d7ead6de0907160822w2e653e16k2440f3ecb12b7a25@mail.gmail.com>
	<1247758897.4235.17.camel@mj>
	<d7ead6de0907160853y2b108463j8238939e05e1b0c9@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:02:55 -0400
Message-Id: <1247842975.25608.47.camel@mj>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
	recognized.
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce grub_malloc0()
X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/grub-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:03:07 -0000

On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 17:53 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:

> > After having written that, I actually tend to prefer grub_zalloc().
> After having read this I agree with you

Committed with grub_zalloc().

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin