From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] liblvm install environment
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:53:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248054838.2425.13.camel@f10-node1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247845102-8166-1-git-send-email-twoerner@redhat.com>
Ok, if we are moving away from "liblvm2app" we should be consistent in
this patch. Our options seem to be:
1) liblvm2
2) liblvm2app
3) liblvm2api
I would vote for #1, #2, and #3 in that order. If we really want to
leave open the door for other lvm libraries in the future, then perhaps
we need another suffix such as #2 or #3.
As has been stated on IRC, if we want to support both lvm1 and lvm2
libraries on the same machine then we cannot simply reuse "liblvm".
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-20 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 15:38 [PATCH] liblvm install environment Thomas Woerner
2009-07-20 1:53 ` Dave Wysochanski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248054838.2425.13.camel@f10-node1 \
--to=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.