From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MTNSR-0008W6-Lw for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:05:11 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTNSQ-0008W1-C6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:05:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTNSM-0008Vp-T2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:05:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49541 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTNSM-0008Vm-Nf for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:05:06 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:4211) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTNSM-0000wB-6E for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:05:06 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2009 18:05:04 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD37734C6A for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:15:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <1248196443.27068.86.camel@mj> <4A660CE9.6040104@gmail.com> <1248211910.18091.8.camel@mj> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:05:02 -0400 Message-Id: <1248213902.18091.20.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] UUID support for UFS X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:05:10 -0000 On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 23:45 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > This change would allow to produce a code which is cleaner, easier to > read and understand. However I'm opposed to modifying printf function > for it. I think Javier misspoke or didn't realize that *printf doesn't need to be modified. > Instead we could just define somewhere: > GRUB_PRIx32 "%x" Better yet, "x", as in libc. That would allow for "%08x" that we need for UUID. But I would prefer that we work on fixing bugs rather than non-bugs. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin