From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: async_tx tree build failure
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:33:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248323620.24951.2.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090723120004.fac867eb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 19:00 -0700, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Since next-20090623, the linux-next build (i386 allmodconfig) has failed
> like this:
>
> crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c: In function ‘async_xor_init’:
> crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c:310: error: size of array ‘type name’ is negative
>
> The failing line is this:
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(dma_addr_t) > sizeof(struct page *));
>
> in async_xor_init() introduced by commit
> 0036731c88fdb5bf4f04a796a30b5e445fc57f54 ("async_tx: kill tx_set_src and
> tx_set_dest methods") in Feb, 2008.
>
> Bisecting in the next-20090623 tree pointed to commit
> 3c30a9ca1fb95214e60e3bf43957971df6668033 ("dmaengine: move HIGHMEM64G
> restriction to ASYNC_TX_DMA") from the async_tx tree. This is now commit
> f3c56e57f66a73a241299dbec1ad55491aa0e403.
Gah, yes that commit was half baked. I have pushed out an updated tree
with the following fix:
diff --git a/crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c b/crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c
index 95fe2c8..90dd3f8 100644
--- a/crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c
+++ b/crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(async_xor_zero_sum);
static int __init async_xor_init(void)
{
- #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE
+ #ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_TX_DMA
/* To conserve stack space the input src_list (array of page pointers)
* is reused to hold the array of dma addresses passed to the driver.
* This conversion is only possible when dma_addr_t is less than the
Thanks,
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-23 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-23 2:00 linux-next: async_tx tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-23 4:33 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-07-23 5:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-07 3:08 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-09 1:35 ` Dan Williams
2009-09-09 1:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248323620.24951.2.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.