From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MURoK-0003kQ-Lk for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:12 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MURoJ-0003jh-5J for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MURoE-0003hz-MN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50390 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MURoE-0003hl-JV for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:06 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:26293) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MURoD-0006Tp-Mg for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:06 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay1.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.111]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2009 16:56:04 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay1.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D691734C6D for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <1248461206.3510.76.camel@fz.local> <1248466144.6620.16.camel@mj> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1248468960.6620.22.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug#495949: grub-common: grub-probe segfaults] X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:56:11 -0000 On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 22:37 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Actualy I already fixed this in my patch for installing on > partitionless devices. Since there were no oppositions I'll commit it OK, go ahead. I just realized that your patch is a subset of my patch, so it would be fair if you apply your part under your name. Just please use a better description in the ChangeLog. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin