From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
To: "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Read outside array bounds
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:17:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248758248.3747.1101.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248756646.1216.662.camel@rc-desk>
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 12:50 +0800, Chatre, Reinette wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:27 -0700, Zhu, Yi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 06:12 +0800, Chatre, Reinette wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 01:28 -0700, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Zhu, Yi
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 4:42 AM
> > > > > To: Roel Kluin; Winkler, Tomas; Chatre, Reinette
> > > > > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
> > > > > Andrew Morton
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Read outside array bounds
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 05:34 +0800, Roel Kluin wrote:
> > > > > > tid is bounded (above) by the size of default_tid_to_tx_fifo (17
> > > > > elements), but
> > > > > > the size of priv->stations[].tid[] is MAX_TID_COUNT (9) elements.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think MAX_TID_COUNT should be defined as 16 or 17. Tomas?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > In general it's 16. In practice we use only 8.
> > >
> > > I think the above statement means that we are mostly using EDCA quality
> > > of service which only uses 8 tids. We do not currently use HCCA (and
> > > thus of course not the hybrid) which would cause more tids to be used.
> > >
> > > A closer look at this flow to this function shows:
> > > rs_tl_turn_on_agg
> >
> > rs_tl_add_packet
> > {
> > ...
> > u8 *qc = ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr);
> > tid = qc[0] & 0xf;
> > ...
> >
> > tl = &lq_data->load[tid];
> > }
> >
> > This should be a problem.
>
> Indeed. Are there any other cases like this that you can think of? It
> seems like we need Roel's fix for iwl_tx_agg_stop also.
Yes. I think we can do an audit for all the ieee80211_ops callbacks with
tid as a parameter. Because mac80211 use u16 for tid, but iwlwifi use u8
internally.
Thanks,
-yi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-28 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-25 21:34 [PATCH] iwlwifi: Read outside array bounds Roel Kluin
2009-07-27 1:41 ` Zhu Yi
2009-07-27 8:28 ` Winkler, Tomas
2009-07-27 22:12 ` reinette chatre
2009-07-28 2:27 ` Zhu Yi
2009-07-28 4:50 ` reinette chatre
2009-07-28 5:17 ` Zhu Yi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248758248.3747.1101.camel@debian \
--to=yi.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.