From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: HAIL volunteer Rick Peralta
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:58:41 +0200
Message-ID: <1248886721.4526.3.camel@decade.local>
References: <29025029.1248785350151.JavaMail.root@mswamui-andean.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	 <4A6F5A3E.1070907@garzik.org> <4A704376.6000303@tiac.net>
	 <4A705D5C.9050909@garzik.org>  <20090729105202.7d0410de.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090729105202.7d0410de.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <hail-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Rick Peralta <fbp@tiac.net>, Project Hail <hail-devel@vger.kernel.org>, zaitcev@redat.com

Am Mittwoch, den 29.07.2009, 10:52 -0600 schrieb Pete Zaitcev:
> I think we're at a point where we have our own base of knowledge
> and evolved an overall architecture to the point we don't have to
> ape every little detail of Google architecture. In particular I'm
> going to fight hard any talk of Chunk doing its own replication,
> for now at least.

Yes. I also think that chunkd should not do it's own replication. As the
strategy may be domain/application dependend. Therefor I'd appreciate if
chunkd would provide some kind of "copy(dst,sha)" function, to be able
to directly copy to another chunkd instance.

- fabian