From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MWOKw-0004sQ-KN for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:37:54 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWOKt-0004qo-I4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:37:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWOKo-0004mu-9v for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:37:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51873 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWOKn-0004mg-Ub for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:37:46 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:7056) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWOKn-0005K4-AS for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:37:45 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2009 01:37:41 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.151] (c-69-141-194-35.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.141.194.35]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11F6934C6D for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:49:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:37:33 -0400 Message-Id: <1248932253.19712.20.camel@ct> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Patch to compile boot.img properly on OSX X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:37:52 -0000 On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:14 +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote: > Hi, > > Pavel, is it ok to commit the patch so we can generate boot.img from > OSX ? (using L_ label as far as i remember). In response to that patch, I was requested to create a private grub repository with separate branches for every patch. I'll need to do that or write an explanation why I won't do it. At the moment, I don't have time for either of that. I don't think it would be a good idea to commit a patch if there is a pending request for action and no approvals, especially since it was a request for testing. Besides, this patch only fixes one file. We have several images that need the same treatment. Also, the problem with lnxboot.S spilled into the build system. This will need to be cleaned up as well. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin