From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MWjw1-00086z-Qj for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:41:37 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWjw0-00085Y-Ki for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:41:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWjvv-0007zE-Vt for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:41:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44078 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWjvv-0007zB-Tn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:41:31 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:27655) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWjvv-0005FB-Pq for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:41:32 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2009 00:41:30 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.151] (c-69-141-194-35.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.141.194.35]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0559C34C6A for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:53:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <1340f8530907191211o53119415nf7510cc1e7a89ee1@mail.gmail.com> <1340f8530907271358g2634fe16w15d4297b1b8f30df@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:41:13 -0400 Message-Id: <1249015273.6669.23.camel@ct> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bug fix for LVM X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:41:36 -0000 On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:15 +0800, Bean wrote: > Hi, > > BTW, I found a regression on r2421 that cause raid5rec to fail: > > http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/trunk/grub2/disk/raid6_recover.c?root=grub&r1=2197&r2=2421 > > buf and buf2 are two different variable. > > This new patch include the revert raid5_recover.c to r1828. Sorry for that! I have reverted that part of the patch, and I'm reviewing the whole commit for possible other errors of that kind. There is no need to combine reverts with other patches. An obvious mistake can be reverted separately. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin