From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MaUrZ-0001VG-Di for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:24:33 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaUrX-0001Te-SQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:24:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaUrT-0001L5-2C for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:24:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50799 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaUrS-0001Kx-VI for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:24:26 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:65187) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaUrS-0001nb-Em for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:24:26 -0400 Received: from [85.180.2.205] (e180002205.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.2.205]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKsym-1MaUrQ37EA-000XGk; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:24:24 +0200 From: Felix Zielcke To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20090731161958.GJ14675@thorin> References: <1248955606.6598.51.camel@fz.local> <4A719AA4.3000905@gmail.com> <1248968735.27471.40.camel@mj> <20090731161958.GJ14675@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:25:26 +0200 Message-Id: <1249910726.3579.12.camel@fz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.27.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX195oiaCb0cFEeV8nABClFgFQ/835JMCz7zD/P+ JTT90uvS3hVmFJjznJz7je+XOAGAUZjH+F1wWXJFByZxqQgOzF HN6p8LuTqIxk07MzCVAibu4ZgR+6QzY X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:24:32 -0000 Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > > Felix Zielcke escribi=C3=B3: > > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. > > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefull= y > > > > comes before December) > > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. > >=20 > > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope that > > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how > > Debian can have any problem with that. >=20 > It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say any= thing > about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready. >=20 > I agree with Pavel, saying GRUB 2 is under development doesn't fail to th= e > truth, but then again there are many ways of saying the truth. I think w= e > should make the website give a clear message that: >=20 > a) GRUB Legacy is obsolete and we don't longer support it >=20 > b) GRUB 2 is more mature than GRUB Legacy >=20 Good idea. I just think that I'm not good at proposing a good wording for it. And maybe we should wait untill 1.97 gets released before telling grub2 is more mature then grub-legacy. --=20 Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer