From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration | Westermann GmbH ] Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:40:49 +0200 Subject: [Cluster-devel] Autotools version requirements to high on cluster master branch? In-Reply-To: <1250075464.23947.9.camel@cerberus.int.fabbione.net> References: <1250073061.19496.63.camel@marc> <1250075464.23947.9.camel@cerberus.int.fabbione.net> Message-ID: <1250077249.21656.21.camel@marc> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2009, 13:11 +0200 schrieb Fabio M. Di Nitto: > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:31 +0200, Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration | > Westermann GmbH ] wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > it asks for libtool 2.2.7 now which isn't released yet but builds just > > fine with version 2.2.6a (just checked it)... > > > > thanks, > > > > Marc > > http://pogma.com/libtool/libtool-2.2.7a.tar.gz > > Keep in mind that master is far from being stable or supported. It will > eat your machines. > > Fabio thanks for the pointer. Got a mail from another user about it and just tried to reproduce the problem. But i don't get the point in forcing users to upgrade there toolchain if earlier versions of tools could build the configure script just fine in the end... I could make some tests to get the right requirements if you are accepting patches against configure.ac which change the requirements to versions which are more suitable for the macros used... BTW i got stable3 up running just fine on our test environment... Marc