From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MbTkR-0005XF-EL for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:25:15 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbTkP-0005Wq-Cm for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:25:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbTkK-0005W6-V2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:25:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40339 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbTkK-0005W1-NC for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:25:08 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:13547) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbTkJ-0005FP-G2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:25:07 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2009 02:25:06 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.151] (c-69-141-194-35.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.141.194.35]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2A9234C6D for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:38:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <1248932253.19712.20.camel@ct> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:24:53 -0400 Message-Id: <1250144693.2352.36.camel@ct> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Patch to compile boot.img properly on OSX X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:25:14 -0000 On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:57 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > This wasn't specific for the patch. Neither was it a requirement, but > more an idea. It's your work and you can choose to do it the way you > like. OK then. The patches have been committed. > Since Yves is interested perhaps he could do the "dirty job" of > applying repetitive fixes and testing different images? And submit a > patch then? Fine with me. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin