From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junio@pobox.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, htejun@gmail.com, bzolnier@gmail.com,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: git send-email defaults
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:04:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251097490.7538.127.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vfxbj1car.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 19:42 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:08 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > ...
> >> That's pretty new... But perhaps I should complain too, it's been
> >> annoying me forever.
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=git&m=123457137328461&w=2
> >
> > Apparently it didn't happen, nor did I ever see a reply to that posting.
> >
> > Junio, what happened here?
>
> Nothing happened.
>
> I do not recall anybody objecting to, but then when nothing happened in
> neither 1.6.3 nor 1.6.4, nobody jumped up-and-down demanding the change of
> default either. So overall impression I got from this was that nobody
> really cared deeply enough either way.
And here I was thinking it was settled when no objections came ;-)
> But we are talking about 1.7.0 to become a release to correct wrong
> defaults we have had once and for all ;-), and I am tempted to roll this
> topic into the mix. Here is what I queued to my 'next' branch tonight.
The sooner this hits the distros the better..
Thanks for committing the change, looking fwd to 1.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 10:19 [PATCH 0/6] Lazy workqueues Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: replace singlethread/freezable/rt parameters and variables with flags Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] workqueue: add support for lazy workqueues Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 12:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-08-20 12:10 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] crypto: use " Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] libata: use lazy workqueues for the pio task Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 12:40 ` Stefan Richter
2009-08-20 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] aio: use lazy workqueues Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 15:09 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-08-21 18:31 ` Zach Brown
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] sunrpc: " Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 12:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] Lazy workqueues Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-20 12:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-23 2:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-24 7:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-08-24 8:04 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-24 9:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-24 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-20 12:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-08-20 12:41 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 13:04 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-20 12:59 ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-08-20 12:55 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-21 6:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1251097490.7538.127.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=junio@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.