From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chandra Seetharaman Subject: Re: Sun StorageTek 2530 and dm? Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:06:01 -0700 Message-ID: <1251147961.24406.34.camel@chandra-ubuntu> References: <20090823210536.4730636d@nb-jsosic> <20090823213448.154d6cff@nb-jsosic> <20090824174834.35a7038f@pc-jsosic.srce.hr> <20090824180058.7cc4edcb@pc-jsosic.srce.hr> <1251139098.24406.1.camel@chandra-ubuntu> <20090824205529.6b78aa3a@pc-jsosic.srce.hr> <1251145456.24406.16.camel@chandra-ubuntu> <20090824223745.33425c32@pc-jsosic.srce.hr> <1251146674.24406.20.camel@chandra-ubuntu> <20090824225324.1ee86d9f@pc-jsosic.srce.hr> Reply-To: sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090824225324.1ee86d9f@pc-jsosic.srce.hr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 22:53 +0200, Jakov Sosic wrote: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:44:34 -0700 > Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > > ok.. simple words; That patch won't help you. > > hm :( so defining "SUN" "LCMS100_S" won't help? Although in > scsi_dh_rdac only "SUN" "LCMS100_F" is defined. And that stands for > Fiber, while mine is SAS cabling... Adding this to scsi_dh_rdac makes sure that the module recognizes your device at boot time itself (provided you have it in your initrd image). > > I've recompiled RPM with added patch, then extracted single module > (scsi_dh_rdac.ko), and put it in place of the original module... > > FATAL: Error inserting scsi_dh_rdac > (/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.4.1.el5xen/kernel/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.ko): > Invalid module format Hmm, just that change should cause this. BTW, can you provide the patch you are trying to add. Can you also provide the (current) o/p of "multipath -ll" and current /etc/multipath.conf. > > I guess I'll have to build the whole kernel just because of this :( > > > > > This is uncalled for!! > > Sorry, I'm easily flammable... but doesn't help the cause :).. lets stay objective here :) > > > >