Re: [RESEND] [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: battery: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n

[Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 18:22 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote: 
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So this is newer version of this patchset.
> > When this will be merged?
> >
> >
> > Last patch doesn't apply, seems that parts of yours patch were applied.
> > I applied it manually.
> >   
> > Will soon test.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > 	Maxim Levitsky
> >   
> 
> I will submit "To: len" next time round.
> 
> You're right, it no longer applies cleanly to acpi-test.  ["patch" is
> happy to apply it and warn about "fuzz", but git-am is more strict.  It
> doesn't look like there's a real conflict.]
I applied it on top of both vanilla and linux-next. Here it really
doesn't apply (with or without 'fuzz')

> 
> I look forward to your results.  Please tell me the diff you end up with
> for the last patch and what tree you applied it on top of.  That way, if
> I add "Tested-by: Maxim..." I can be certain we're talking about the
> same patch :-).
> 
> Thanks!
> Alan

I did that few days ago (applied patch manually, without much thinking)

Unfortunately, resulting kernel oopses if battery is present, and
otherwise, if I plug batter later on, many battery statistics are
missing (probably some locks are held)

I will soon investigate this issue, more deeply.

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky