From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MmE0k-0004G8-Nj for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:50:30 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MmE0j-0004G2-TZ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:50:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MmE0e-0004Fm-F6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:50:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44836 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MmE0e-0004Fd-BS for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:50:24 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:5022) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MmE0d-0004t5-RW for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:50:24 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay1.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.111]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2009 17:50:16 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by smtprelay1.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABF0634C69 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:50:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <1248454704.3510.67.camel@fz.local> <1248463471.3510.77.camel@fz.local> <20090725163636.GL12326@thorin> <1248559576.11389.33.camel@mj> <20090728175514.GE32726@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:50:10 -0400 Message-Id: <1252705810.2616.8.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix an infinite loop with a corrupted pc partition table X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:50:30 -0000 On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:40 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > I would prefer something simpler, but if that's not possible, this is better > > than hardcoding a number IMO. > > > > Unless Pavel has any objection, I think it's ok. > Any problems with this one? No objections. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin