From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alan D. Brunelle" Subject: Re: lvmcreate -i 128 limitation Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:37:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1253540262.4612.29.camel@cail> References: <1253536631.4612.13.camel@cail> <20090921125601.GD1210@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> <20090921125824.GE1210@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090921125824.GE1210@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 13:58 +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:56:01PM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > > What error message do you get? > > Found it. > > There's no kernel-side limitation and no lvm2-format metadata limitation > I can think of. > > Just a restriction inherited from LVM1 that we've never had cause to remove. > > Alasdair Thanks Alasdair - Yeah, I noticed the kernel-side looked like it didn't care. Hadn't thought about LVM1 being the cause... Alan