From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.13]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8NMPJ1O023595 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:25:19 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8NMP7is021415 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:25:07 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MqaGn-0002Hs-Hb for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:25:05 +0200 Received: from d67-193-217-194.home3.cgocable.net ([67.193.217.194]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:25:05 +0200 Received: from brian by d67-193-217-194.home3.cgocable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:25:05 +0200 From: "Brian J. Murrell" Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:20:54 -0400 Message-ID: <1253744454.22764.55.camel@pc.interlinx.bc.ca> References: <1189098393.21669.43.camel@pc.ilinx> <1189098830.21669.47.camel@pc.ilinx> <20070906190902.GX2064@agk.fab.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HOnSMU3Uv0zRXowfPT74" In-Reply-To: <20070906190902.GX2064@agk.fab.redhat.com> Sender: news Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: collapse (merge) snapshot into origin Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com --=-HOnSMU3Uv0zRXowfPT74 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:09 +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:13:50PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > > being considered for an official LVM release? > =20 > Snapshot merging: yes. > The patches depended on another change (tracking all snapshot I/O to elim= inate > theoretical races) that's still outstanding, but once that's dealt with (= it's > tricky - my original proof-of-concept patch was ~800 lines so needed brea= king > up and rewriting), I expect them to follow quite quickly. Any progress on this? b. --=-HOnSMU3Uv0zRXowfPT74 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkq6n0YACgkQl3EQlGLyuXABGwCg9XBIzUBkXvCZw1wfDkGMPo8C 1MQAn3CIk+6oEOF7JjxmA1/z5qbBEEET =uMrR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HOnSMU3Uv0zRXowfPT74--