All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com>
To: "ext Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto" <saaguirre@ti.com>
Cc: "Deak Imre (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <imre.deak@nokia.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH] omapfb: Condition mutex acquisition
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:53:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254236004.23991.17.camel@tubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A24693684029E5489D1D202277BE89444B781B70@dlee02.ent.ti.com>

On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:34 +0200, ext Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
wrote:
> From: Tomi Valkeinen [tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:22 AM
> > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:14 +0200, ext Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
> > wrote:
> > > From: Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@ti.com>
> > >
> > > Acquiring mutex before framebuffer registration doesn't make sense,
> > > As there's no danger of external access to the memory related fields.
> > 
> > What problem does this patch solve? It makes the code more complex.
> > 
> 
> Tomi,
> 
> Thanks for your time.
> 
> The problem was that, during platform driver registration,
> this sequence was executed:
> 
> -> omapfb_probe
>    -> omapfb_do_probe
>       -> planes_init
>          -> fbinfo_init
>             -> set_fb_fix
>       ...
>       -> register_framebuffer
> 
> And then, inside that function, an attempt of acquiring a
> mutex failed, because it wasn't initialized before trying it:
> 
> mutex_lock(&fbi->mm_lock);
> 
> It is actually initialized later in omapfb_do_probe in register_framebuffer call.
> 
> So, how is the best to solve this then?

Oh, I wasn't implying that there's something wrong with the fix, I just
didn't know what it was fixing =).

Looks like a valid fix to me.

 Tomi



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-29 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-29 14:14 [RFC][PATCH] omapfb: Condition mutex acquisition Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-29 14:22 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2009-09-29 14:34   ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-29 14:37     ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-29 14:43     ` Hunter, Jon
2009-09-29 14:53     ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2009-09-29 14:56       ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-29 18:26         ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2009-09-30  8:32           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2009-09-30  0:53       ` Tony Lindgren
2009-09-30  8:35         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2009-09-30 12:08         ` Imre Deak
2009-09-30 13:34           ` Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
2009-09-30 15:34             ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1254236004.23991.17.camel@tubuntu \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saaguirre@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.